Research

COLLEGE-IN-3 RESEARCH AND ASSESSMENT PLAN

What Will It Take To Establish A 3-Year Degree At Your Institution?

Research and Assessment Plan

December 2025 Edition

Madeleine F. Green, Executive Director, College-in-3 Exchange

Overview

The College-in-3 initiative seeks to design, launch, and evaluate 3-year degree programs that are academically rigorous, financially viable, and broadly accessible. Critical to the success of 3-year programs is understanding their scope and shape, providing evidence of their impact on students and institutions, and using this evidence for continuous program improvement. The College-in-3 Exchange has developed a multi-year research agenda to address questions about program scale, impact, and sustainability. The specific research questions are outlined below.

The research serves two interrelated purposes:

  1. To measure the institutional context of College-in-3 programs across participating institutions. A study led by Robert Zemsky, Professor Emeritus at the University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education, will compare selected IPEDS-equivalent variables across 3-year degree programs. Data will be collected on student demographics, retention from first to second year and from second to third year, and financial aid utilization. Institutions will also provide information on the disciplines/fields of their 3-year programs and student enrollments.
  2. To assess student learning, program effectiveness and program outcomes, institutions will collect and share with the Cin3 research team information on student learning outcomes and student satisfaction through direct and indirect measures. In the process, Cin3 will assist member institutions in developing evidence-based assessment plans to evaluate student learning. A template for an assessment plan is provided to each Cin3 member institution. They will track the percentage of students meeting specified program learning outcomes and administer surveys to students to learn about their perceptions of their experience in the 3-year degree program. Additionally, institutions will gather data on completion rates, employment, and costs. This study is led by Dr. Carleen Vande Zande.

Research Questions

Student Learning:

How do the students who enroll in the Cin3 program perform? (direct assessment)

Data Collected:

Learning Outcomes: The percentage of students demonstrating proficiency in at least three program- designated learning outcomes.

Student Satisfaction:

What is the student experience during and after the program? (direct assessment)

Data Collected:

Student/Alumni Satisfaction: Information gathered on student satisfaction at the point of program exit, over time.

Program Outcomes:

To what extent does a 3-year program reduce costs for students?

Data Collected:

Cost at Graduation: The cost of tuition and fees of a 3-year program, along with a comparison between graduates of the 3-year and 4-year programs

To what extent do students in 3-year programs have completion rates that are equal to or better than students in 4-year programs.

Data to be collected:

  • Completion rates: Data tracking overall program completion rates.  (3 years, 5 years., etc.)

To what extent are graduates of 3-year programs employed upon graduation?

Data to be collected:

  • Employment Rates: Data on the employment rates of program graduates.
  • Comparison with 4-year graduates (where available)

Institutional Context (IPEDS data and IPEDS-equivalent data):

How many member institutions will launch College-in-3 programs through December 2025? By December 2026? By December 2027?

  Data to be Collected:

  • Cin3 count of launched programs

In what fields/disciplines are Cin3 members launching 3-year programs and how do they differ from other programs offered by the institution?

Data to be collected:

  • A compendium/count of launched program by field

In what fields/disciplines are Cin3 members launching 3-year programs and how do they differ from other programs offered by the institution?

Data to be collected:

  • A compendium/count of launched program by field

How many students were enrolled in these programs?

Data to be collected:

  • Enrollments by program and institution

How do the demographic profiles of students in these programs differ from the demographic profile of the overall student population of the host institution?

Data to be collected:

  • Demographic profile of students enrolled in 3-year programs (race, ethnicity, gender)

What role does financial aid play in shaping enrollments and patterns of retention?

Data to be collected:

  • Percentage of students receiving Pell grants, Loans, institutional aid

How many students does each program retain first to second year? Second to third year?

Data to be collected:

  • Retention from first to second year, second to third year.

Outputs

  • Assessment Template for structuring institutional assessment efforts.
  • Sample Assessment Plans posted on Cin3 website.
  • Common Metrics for tracking outcomes: learning outcomes at program level, time to degree, post-graduation employment, tuition and fees.
  • Annual reports.

Guiding Principles

Comparability:   Use agreed-upon definitions to ensure consistent measurement.

Customization:  Respect institutional differences in assessment processes and accreditor requirements.

Actionability:      Ensure findings are directly used to improve programs, teaching, and student support services.